Hehe okay.
Really, all we're waiting for is qtox:
[14:34] <LittleVulpix> Heya folks! When will the 0.2.p (i.e. the new api utox) be available via utox_updater, anyone knows?
[14:34] <fr33domlover> I'm getting blank mesages in tox
[14:34] <fr33domlover> anyone saw this problem?
[14:34] <@zetok> LittleVulpix: it will be available when all clients will support new API
[14:35] <LittleVulpix> blank messages = new tox talking to old tox and vice-versa
[14:35] <LittleVulpix> @zetok It's problematic for me because my friend who uses linux already somehow has the new api version
[14:35] <fr33domlover> LittleVulpix, how do I know which is the old one
[14:36] <fr33domlover> I use packages made from the daily build
[14:36] <fr33domlover> / jenkins
[14:36] <@zetok> eh
[14:36] <LittleVulpix> There's your problem then
[14:37] <LittleVulpix> If you use the daily builds then you likely have the new api
[14:37] <LittleVulpix> pity that there wasn't some commit for the tox old api that would make it say "bla bla your partner is using new api please update your tox"
[14:40] <@zetok> switch of all clients to new API was supposed to happen already few days ago, but unfortunately qTox dev who said that he'll be porting it had some events happen that simply limited time he could spend on porting qTox.. and sadly, no one else seems to be really interested in helping port & rewrite qToxIf you're up for it, then:
https://github.com/tux3/qTox/issues/1520 hehe